}

https://images.app.goo.gl/mfUvFB7FaVGNs24W8

“I think all our society is run by insane people for insane objectives… I think we’re being run by maniacs for maniacal means. If anybody can put on paper what our government and the American government and the Russian… Chinese… what they are actually trying to do, and what they think they’re doing, I’d be very pleased to know what they think they’re doing. I think they’re all insane. But I’m liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That’s what’s insane about it.” ~John Lennon

The one person that can shed the most light on the combined efforts of the DNC and intelligence community -- including the FBI -- to prevent the 2016 election of Donald Trump is Julian Assange, a hero to the left when he exposed the war crimes of the Bush administration, but now anathema for exposing them for the power-mad megalomaniacs they really are. This has never been an issue of the false left-right dichotomy, but the deep state cabal vs the American people, something Assange understands only too well. And now the powers that shouldn’t be on both sides of the Atlantic want to kill him for it.

As everyone is aware, Julian Assange is being housed in Britain’s notorious Belmarsh Prison where both his physical and mental health is failing. If he is extradited to the US to face 18 charges, including espionage, he will likely be locked up for what’s left of his life in a supermax prison in Colorado -- the same prison that houses El Chapo Guzman and hate preacher Abu Hamza. This prison, dubbed “the Alcatraz of the Rockies” is described by Amnesty International thus, “...the conditions are inhumane. Others described it as a ‘high-tech version of Hell, designed to shut down all sensory perception’, and a ‘place worse than the death penalty.’ The prison houses 400 inmates and is guarded by gun towers, dogs, and armed patrols.”

https://thewashingtonstandard.com/mother-of-julian-assanges-children-warns-about-his-fate/

The possibility of Assange receiving a fair trial in either the UK or the US is nil. Human rights groups including Amnesty International have been barred from the extradition hearings at the Old Bailey in London. If Assange is extradited to the US for trial it will have far-reaching implications for journalists everywhere.

“Assange’s lawyers say that because he is charged under the century-old Espionage Act, the Trump administration is setting dangerous precedents. The law bans government secrets from being published and no protections are offered to the press under the First Amendment that guarantees free speech.”

“His defense team is basically saying that criminal laws in the U.S. apply abroad but its constitutional protections don’t, which means journalists anywhere on Earth are at risk of being prosecuted by the U.S. if they publish content the U.S. government deems to violate its laws. The Obama administration had debates over the Espionage Act against Julian Assange but came to the conclusion to decide against it.” [emphasis added]

“But President Trump has been at war with the press that often refers to as “enemy of the people” and doesn’t have a problem with going after the press. The Justice Department under Trump has said the hacked material was published with no regard to the safety of those named in the leaks therefore Assange isn’t defined as being a journalist.”

https://thewashingtonstandard.com/mother-of-julian-assanges-children-warns-about-his-fate/

Assange’s problems don’t end with an unfair prosecution however. While the US Mockingbird media has remained mostly silent on the hearings, revelations by a Spanish security agent from UC Global exposed a CIA plot to assassinate Julian Assange using poison.

“The Old Bailey in London is holding its second week of hearings concerning Julian Assange’s extradition, and powerful new testimony has been presented revealing how the CIA actually plotted to assassinate Assange, either by poisoning or through a kidnapping plot.”

“This bombshell testimony came as part of the defense team’s efforts to frame the United States extradition case as being entirely political in nature, and not based on Assange having broken any U.S. laws. It also aims to convince the judge in the case that the WikiLeaks founder, were he to be extradited, will almost certainly face excessive and extreme punishment if he gets sent back to America.”

https://www.newstarget.com/2020-10-04-cia-poison-julian-assange-steal-dna.html

UC Global was tasked with providing security for the Ecuadorian Embassy while Assange was there. Two of their former agents disclosed that not only was there a plot to assassinate or kidnap Assange, he was also under intense surveillance the entire seven years he was under asylum at the embassy.

“The CIA also sought to obtain biometric information from Assange’s close friends and family members as they visited him at the embassy. In one instance, the plan was to lift a DNA sample from his child’s dirty diaper for the purpose of trying to perform a covert kill operation.”

“‘Microphones were concealed to monitor Assange’s meetings with lawyers, his fingerprint was obtained from a glass and there was even a plot to obtain a nappy from a baby who had been brought on a regular visit to the embassy, according to the witness, whose evidence took the form of a written statement,’ reports The Guardian, as relayed by Zero Hedge.”

https://www.newstarget.com/2020-10-04-cia-poison-julian-assange-steal-dna.html

The two former agents also divulged that it wasn’t only the CIA but UC Global’s director David Morales that was involved in the plot. They were allowed to testify anonymously for fear of retribution by the CIA and UC Global’s Morales. “Assange’s defense team is hoping that this testimony will be enough of an indictment of the CIA and its international partners that the U.S.-requested extradition of Assange will not be permitted.”

What Assange’s defense team seem not to understand is that the CIA is a clone of the UK’s MI-6 -- the two are virtually inseparable. During WWII the OSS (Office of Strategic Services) was formed, modelled after MI-6. Five-eyes (FVEY) is the intelligence sharing apparatus of former British Commonwealth nations and the US Intelligence agencies, primarily CIA. For all intents and purposes, they are one and the same. If the CIA is involved in taking down Assange, then so too is MI-6.

All of this is naturally being ignored and/or censored by the American Mockingbird media. According to Julian’s friend and confidante, Craig Murray:

“Craig Murray, the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and longtime confidant of Julian Assange, has been fastidiously reporting on the Australian publisher’s extradition hearing to the United States. Yet few people have been reading it. This, according to Murray, is because of a deliberate decision by online media giants to downplay or suppress discussion of the case. On his blog, Murray wrote that he usually receives around 50 percent of his readers from Twitter and 40 percent from Facebook links, but that has dropped to 3 percent and 9 percent, respectively during the hearing. While the February hearings sent around 200,000 readers to his site daily, now that figure is only 3,000.”

https://thewashingtonstandard.com/reporters-claim-facebook-is-censoring-information-on-julian-assange-case/

It just goes to show that the social media giants, like the MSM, are just adjuncts to the CIA and Deep State. It should come as no big surprise, most got their start-up money from DARPA and IN-Q-Tel.

“There has been considerable public interest in the court proceedings, but very little mainstream attention given to them. To be fair, British authorities have made it inordinately difficult to cover the case, allowing only a small handful of journalists into the Old Bailey court system, where they can watch a live television link up but cannot bring in recording devices. An online stream can only be watched if one registers and signs in between exactly 9:30 and 9:40 a.m., and if they suffer even a momentary lapse in wifi connection, they are shut out of the session. The court system has also blocked human rights groups, including Amnesty International, from monitoring proceedings.”

https://thewashingtonstandard.com/reporters-claim-facebook-is-censoring-information-on-julian-assange-case/

Unlike their American counterparts, journalists in the UK do not enjoy the same freedom of the press. The media in Britain is scrupulously (or unscrupulously as the case may be) monitored by the government. For example nothing disparaging about the royal family is allowed to be published. In America the censorship is left to the MSM, which self-censors, and the online giants such as Google (and its subsidiaries), Facebook, Twitter, etc., who typically censor, demonetize, or shadow ban anything critical of the Deep State.

“Online media creators have, for many years, lived with the threat of algorithmic suppression or demonetization of content on sensitive or controversial issues. YouTube regularly cuts all advertising on videos on the Syrian Civil War, fracking, or other topics on which advertisers might not wish to promote scrutiny. Even airsoft and paintball enthusiasts have learned not to use words like “shoot” and “gun” in their titles, lest the platform demonetizes their content.”

“Perhaps more alarmingly, however, Silicon Valley tech giants are becoming increasingly closely intertwined with the state department, to the point where it is often difficult to tell where one ends, and another begins. ‘What Lockheed Martin was to the twentieth century…technology and cyber-security companies [like Google] will be to the twenty-first,’ wrote Google executives Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen in their book, “The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business.” For example, Facebook is now in a close partnership with the Atlantic Council, who essentially decides for them what content to promote in people’s news feeds and what content is discarded as fake news, misinformation, or low quality. The problem is that the Atlantic Council is a NATO cutout, and a government-funded organization whose board of directors is a who’s who of deep state officials, including virtually every living ex-C.I.A. director, Bush-era cabinet members like Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell, and military generals like Wesley Clark and David Petraeus. Thus, an organization like this deciding what the world sees on their screens is barely one step removed from total government control of the flow of information.”

https://thewashingtonstandard.com/reporters-claim-facebook-is-censoring-information-on-julian-assange-case/

“Democracy dies in darkness,” indeed. Julian Assange is guilty of telling embarrassing truths, nothing more. He and Wikileaks were doing the job the mainstream media refuses to do. The purpose of the free press clause of the First Amendment is to keep the government honest. By their unfair treatment of Assange they are demonstrating beyond any shadow of doubt how dishonest they have become.

“While the U.S. media has remained mostly silent on these hearings, which is hardly a surprise, some media outlets have been covering it, exposing the CIA as an out-of-control mafia-type organization that does not want people like Assange, who actually tell the truth, to roam free.”

https://www.newstarget.com/2020-10-04-cia-poison-julian-assange-steal-dna.html

And the rest of the government has followed suit. There is no more honor or integrity left in the US Government, they are just a reflection of the people that elect them. Julian Assange will never get a fair trial -- either in the US or the UK... the Deep State cabal has too much to lose. To paraphrase George Orwell: “In the empire of lies those who tell the truth are despised.” Assange is a threat only because the truth is a threat and for that reason alone he must be made an example of. There has been talk of the possibility of Assange committing suicide… predictive programming to coverup an assassination?