Charity May Require Sacrifice, Prosperism Needs No Sacrifice


Source

I've written quite a few blog posts on Charity and a new technology powered socioeconomic system: Prosperism. The traditional understanding of charity keeps coming up whenever I talk about incentivized and equitable sharing, so I thought I explain the difference through this blog, and the one that follows this one.

Charity Vs Prosperism

While charity is a moral socioethical concept, which might carry different meaning to different individuals, Prosperism is a clearly defined scientifically provable decentralized Zero-Loss socioeconomic platform that democratizes wealth generation and distribution based on incentivized and equitable sharing

So, in contrast to Charity, Prosperism is devoid of any moral or ethical obligation and requires no sacrifice on anyone's part and it taxes no one while benefiting every one.

My First Experiment (Giving Incentivized By Receiving) Bears Fruit

As an example, I recently carried out an experiment on sharing my influence with Steemians to help those in need. 24 Steemians participated in the experiment and 24 more have already pledged this week. So far my 48 upvotes have helped 48 needy people across the globe. Neither I sacrificed anything, nor the Steemians who pledged to help did. We all just shared our influence for a good cause.

Weekly Prosperism Exercise To Continue

Incentivized sharing so far seems to have been working, though it definitely requires some tweeking and oversight, which we'll do as we go along. Suggestions are welcome.

Cheers :)

Share_your_Influnce-01.gif

H2
H3
H4
Upload from PC
Video gallery
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
27 Comments