Can you decide who you let into your home? Or does someone else get to decide for you? When it comes to borders though, the issue gets confounded and larger grouping authoritative bodies want to impose upon the smaller ones to force them to let people in.
I know some people don't like borders, or think they are illegitimate to be created in the first place. But I have argued before that borders and boundaries are found at many levels of human living, from the homes we separate into and keep boundaries for privacy and individual operation as a separate family unit within society, and even within the home there are rooms for each individual within that unit. As more individuals aggregate together, yet not live in the same home, they too can create boundaries of various kinds, such as community boundaries if they so choose which has been done in gated communities.
Further, you can get to the point of boundaries between nations where certain groups of people agree to live a certain way that differs from other groups of people who agree to live a different way. The boundary states that over here we live like this, and over there will maybe you don't live like this. Just as within each individual home family units may operate differently, and even within each individual room people will behave differently and organize their rooms differently.
Source: wikimedia
Dysfunctional Plan for Migrants and Refugees
I bring this issue up again because the European Union's European Commission is now taking legal action against the three member states of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic. They are being accused of not having "taken the necessary action" to deal with the dislocated migrants and refugees from the past years.
They are being expected to distribute asylum-seekers throughout their country just as Greece, Italy and other member states have done. Since January of this year alone, other countries within the Euro-bloc have relocated over 10,000 people from Italy and Greece, a fivefold increase compared to the same period last year, says the European Commission. But the Czech Prime Minister is calling out this plan as dysfunctional.
“The European Commission blindly insists on pushing ahead with dysfunctional quotas which decreased citizens’ trust in EU abilities and pushed back working and conceptual solutions to the migration crisis,” said Czech Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka.
Legal Obligation
Source: flickr
Dimitris Avramopoulos, Minister of Defence, Greece – Presidency of the European Union
Warsaw, Poland is also refusing to accept the quota of refugees as established by the European Commission, and are getting ready to take their right to refuse refugees into their nation into a European Union court. The EU Commission's migration commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos has said “When it comes to relocation, let me be crystal clear: the implementation of the Council Decisions on relocation is a legal obligation, not a choice.”
You see, what the EU wants is for nations to have blind obedience to their centralized authority. And what I find funny about this is that many nations operate the same way towards their own citizens by expecting obedience to the centralized authority, or from the communities within their own country.
Countries like the Czech Republic, Romania, Slovakia and Hungary have been staunchly opposed to this dysfunctional plan where they are forced to accept migrants and refugees based on obligatory quotas. If a nation wants to operate differently, and create more secure borders, this runs in opposition to the European Union's plans for the future of Europe.
Freedom and Privacy
If individuals have freedom and privacy from others in their rooms, and families have freedom and privacy from other families in their houses, then why can some nations have freedom and privacy from other nations, while others can't and "need to do as their told" from a higher up boss? Because they made a foolish agreement to subsume their national authority to a centralized European authority. People can still choose to change it, if they have the numbers.
A Centralized New World Order
The European Union, and how it overrides the authority of individual nations, is just the next step in the agenda towards world government. It's also just a continuation of what we arty have at smaller scales. Each subsequent level subsumes its authority to the level above.
Unions of nations supersede nations. Nations supersede provinces are states. Provinces supersede cities or towns. Cities or towns supersede the individual. We just keep repeating the same model upwards towards more centralized governance and control over all the smaller groups until it reaches a one world government. This is known as the agenda for a new world order or NWO.
References: