For the last year, I have been looking for a process to use the Steemit functions to develop and to promote solar energy.
Yesterday, I posted
@chrisaiki/solarcoach-is-using-our-steem-power-to-produce-renewable-solar-energy
which is explaining that @solarcoach will post 5 comments per day and that the steem collected from these replies will be invested in collective solar plants.
So, I tested this process and I received several positive feed-back, including @roelandp
Then came M. @transito who down voted my 5 comments with the strenght of his 500,000 SP !
I got this comment :
“I don't know what it's about but your ugly logo is overly distracting. “
I can understand that people don’t like this logo, but I don’t understand that a whale destroys the work of someone who is looking to add new function to Steemit.
Ok, @solarcoach is planning to add 5 automated comments per day which are not link with the subject of the post.
My opinion is that someone can receive an out-of-topic reply if it is for a good cause. There is a difference between a spamer who is begging for upvote for himself and a social enterprise who is promoting solar energy.
So I am going to re-test the @solarcoach process today.
If M. @transito, big whale with 500,000 SP does want me to pursue this venture, I will do it on another network.
I did like Steemit, I UpPower 300 SBD yesterday and I just explain to @stellabelle how I met nice people and which projects I liked the most on Steemit in a reply to her post
@stellabelle/is-steemit-in-an-economic-and-social-suicide-death-spiral
Today, I am less sure that Steemit is not in a death spiral.
You, Steemians, have the power to support my action.
Thank you.